United States is supporting the recent MILITARY COUP in Egypt, when not long ago it condemned Honduras for a nonexistent COUP.
Vice President Omar Suleiman announced yesterday on Egypt state television that President Hosni Mubarak handed the power to the Military Supreme Council.
A Coup happens when State institutions are dissolved, Parliament is dissolved , the judiciary is dissolved, and a Military Junta seizes power. In Honduras there was NO military coup or civilian-military coup. We had an interim civilian administration, which produced an orderly transition to the new administration we have now. But we were unjustly condemned, and we are still being condemned.
CNN in Espanol is talking about a “revolution in Egypt.” Perhaps this way it sounds more romantic and acceptable, but at the end of the day: What is the difference between a revolution and a COUP? It is basically the same: a rupture of the constitutional order.
If it’s about popular support, the interim regime enjoyed a wide support in Honduras, both from the people and the State institutions.
We must keep an open mind, sometimes COUPS are necessary. There are good coups and bad coups. With a COUP D’ETAT against Adolf Hitler many lives could have been saved. This COUP in Egypt may be the beginning of a new era of freedom for the Egyptian people, that’s our hope, but in Honduras there was NO Coup d’Etat.
Dictator Hugo Chavez is supporting the MILITARY COUP in Egypt. Manuel Zelaya is also supporting the coup. Both are known for their failed attempts at COUPS in their countries. They are COUPSTERS that support MILITARY COUPS when it better suits them.
The day before his ouster, on Saturday June 27, 2009, Manuel Zelaya made reference to the French Revolution to justify his projected COUP, which would dissolve the other branches of government and extend his term in office illegally; but he could not achieve this because the State of Honduras, in a movement of self-defense, removed him from office.
Hugo Chavez in 1992, was responsible for a failed MILITARY COUP attempt that killed innocent people. And yet, the failed COUPSTER believes he has the moral right to condemn a coup that never existed in Honduras.
These are the ironies and contradictions of international politics.
Yo siempre ha sido de la teoria que tanto el Grupo Militar como la CIA y el Departamento de Estado por medio de su embajador, orquestaron la caida de Zelaya con el proposito de deterner la expansion de el chavismo en Centro America. Esto constituyo una de las provocaciones mas secretas y exitosas jamas realizadas en ejercicio de una politica exterior y planes especificos que se originan durante la Administracion Bush 43 especificamente en la oficina del asesor presidencial para asuntos andinos.
La suscesion presidencial que se dio en Honduras a mediados de 2009 fue un golpe a la narcoactividad y negocios afiliados, a la ALBA, al chavismo, al Castrismo y al populismo del SXXI tan es asi que Guatemala y El Salvador pusieron distancia entre ellos y la ALBA y sus presidente han estado “bien portaditos“ desde entonces.
La astucia y fineza con que el Embajador H. Llorens manejo su mision durante la crisis y aun al dia de hoy permitio que la trama se mantuviera encubierta, apareciendo los Estados Unidos como fuerte y vocalizante opositor al “golpe“ demandando acciones de restutucion de parte de Honduras e imponiendo sanciones “no obstante simbolicas“ a los principales actores dentro del Ejecutivo, Legislativo y Poder Judicial del periodo presidencial que completo R. Micheletti Bain. Bravo!
Interesante teoría, podría ser argumento para una novela de ficción. Lástima que en el mundo real la narcoactividad siga campante, que el presidente Lobo viva de rodillas tratando de apaciguar a los enemigos de Honduras, distrayendo la atención en el tema político de re-elección, y que el embajador Hugo Llorens siga presionando por el regreso en completa impunidad del ex-presidente Zelaya.